Dwarf Fortress Bug Tracker - Dwarf Fortress
View Issue Details
0005770Dwarf FortressDwarf Mode -- Noblespublic2012-04-03 20:222012-04-04 10:36
musicmastermsh 
Footkerchief 
lowfeaturehave not tried
resolvedno change required 
0.34.07 
 
0005770: Countess sends her own lover to jail for violation of production mandate
I smile and think about how dwarfy she is when I see this...

though they've been "lovers" for almost the entire 11 years I've had this fort - maybe she's not really all that into him after all?

Seriously, though - maybe she shouldn't do that? Might interfere with her personal life and all.
Get a dwarf promoted to nobility in a small fort (mine's only 20 dwarves), then ignore their mandates?
started this world and fort in 34.05
Intentional/Expected?
related to 0003823new  Noble consorts have no room requirements, don't show up in Nobles screen 
Issue History
2012-04-03 20:22musicmastermshNew Issue
2012-04-03 21:48KogutNote Added: 0022069
2012-04-04 08:30FootkerchiefTag Attached: Intentional/Expected?
2012-04-04 08:31FootkerchiefNote Added: 0022074
2012-04-04 08:46QuietustNote Added: 0022077
2012-04-04 08:49QuietustNote Edited: 0022077bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0022077#r8216
2012-04-04 09:13NW_KohakuNote Added: 0022079
2012-04-04 10:36FootkerchiefNote Added: 0022081
2012-04-04 10:36FootkerchiefStatusnew => resolved
2012-04-04 10:36FootkerchiefResolutionopen => no change required
2012-04-04 10:36FootkerchiefAssigned To => Footkerchief
2012-04-04 10:36FootkerchiefRelationship addedrelated to 0003823

Notes
(0022069)
Kogut   
2012-04-03 21:48   
related (from old forum system): "My mayor ordered himself beaten" - http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=6515.msg79136#msg79136 [^]
(0022074)
Footkerchief   
2012-04-04 08:31   
That one was fixed:

000172 ▪ (0.27.169.33e) [dwarf mode][justice] nobles punish themselves for violating export mandates
(0022077)
Quietust   
2012-04-04 08:46   
(edited on: 2012-04-04 08:49)
If the countess had punished her husband, then this would probably be a bug (along the lines of 0003823).

(0022079)
NW_Kohaku   
2012-04-04 09:13   
Maybe this falls more under the "incomplete feature" category than "bug", but making nobles show favoritism is something very reasonable to expect, in the same way that it is humorously bizarre for a mayor to order himself thrown in prison for not fulfilling his own mandate.

Nobody really expects such blind, self-destructive fairness in the system, especially a system that is supposed to be representing the selfishness of those with power to begin with, so it breaks verisimilitude.
(0022081)
Footkerchief   
2012-04-04 10:36   
If the countess had punished her husband, then this would probably be a bug

This is a good point. Entity positions (e.g. consorts) are the intended mechanism for preventing improper punishments, and a lover doesn't get an entity position. I agree that this is just a hair out of bug territory.