Dwarf Fortress Bug Tracker - Dwarf Fortress |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0008649 | Dwarf Fortress | Dwarf Mode -- Jobs, Designations | public | 2014-12-20 19:17 | 2014-12-30 13:22 |
|
Reporter | glindsey1979 | |
Assigned To | Toady One | |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | Windows | OS Version | 8.1 |
Product Version | 0.40.21 | |
Target Version | | Fixed in Version | 0.40.24 | |
|
Summary | 0008649: Unreachable high-priority mining jobs prevent lower-priority jobs from being taken |
Description | When I first began this fortress, the new mining designations were working beautifully. However, now it seems that the miners are completely ignoring any designations that are priority 3 or lower. Priorities 1 and 2 work fine, but no others do. |
Steps To Reproduce | I'm not sure when it started happening; I assume just continue to play the game for long enough. |
Additional Information | |
Tags | Save Included |
Relationships | has duplicate | 0008661 | resolved | Knight Otu | Dwarves ignoring low-priority designations in favor of inaccessible high-priority designations (QoL) | has duplicate | 0008669 | resolved | Knight Otu | Dwarves won't do lower piority desigiatons if the cannot path to higher priority designations | has duplicate | 0008677 | resolved | Knight Otu | Miners will idle if a mining designation exists, but a higher ranking designation is blocked off |
|
Attached Files | |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2014-12-20 19:17 | glindsey1979 | New Issue | |
2014-12-20 19:23 | Footkerchief | Note Added: 0031395 | |
2014-12-20 19:23 | Footkerchief | Assigned To | => Footkerchief |
2014-12-20 19:23 | Footkerchief | Status | new => needs feedback |
2014-12-20 21:24 | glindsey1979 | Note Added: 0031399 | |
2014-12-20 21:24 | glindsey1979 | Status | needs feedback => assigned |
2014-12-21 00:15 | Footkerchief | Summary | Miners seem to start ignoring lower priority mining designations => Unreachable high-priority mining jobs prevent lower-priority jobs from being taken |
2014-12-21 00:15 | Footkerchief | Status | assigned => new |
2014-12-21 08:59 | Toady One | Note Added: 0031410 | |
2014-12-21 12:24 | Footkerchief | Status | new => needs feedback |
2014-12-22 05:58 | glindsey1979 | Note Added: 0031431 | |
2014-12-22 05:58 | glindsey1979 | Status | needs feedback => assigned |
2014-12-22 18:40 | glindsey1979 | Note Added: 0031439 | |
2014-12-22 22:18 | Footkerchief | Note Added: 0031441 | |
2014-12-22 22:18 | Footkerchief | Status | assigned => needs feedback |
2014-12-24 04:45 | Knight Otu | Relationship added | has duplicate 0008661 |
2014-12-26 15:24 | Knight Otu | Relationship added | has duplicate 0008669 |
2014-12-27 06:09 | Ratter | Note Added: 0031507 | |
2014-12-27 06:45 | Ratter | Note Edited: 0031507 | bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0031507#r12605 |
2014-12-27 07:29 | Ratter | Issue Monitored: Ratter | |
2014-12-27 09:23 | lethosor | Tag Attached: Save Included | |
2014-12-27 09:23 | lethosor | Tag Attached: Save Needs Testing | |
2014-12-27 20:02 | Footkerchief | Note Added: 0031531 | |
2014-12-27 20:02 | Footkerchief | Status | needs feedback => confirmed |
2014-12-27 20:03 | Footkerchief | Tag Detached: Save Needs Testing | |
2014-12-27 20:03 | Footkerchief | Issue Monitored: Toady One | |
2014-12-28 07:35 | nanite | Note Added: 0031534 | |
2014-12-28 21:39 | Veroule | Note Added: 0031547 | |
2014-12-29 05:53 | Knight Otu | Relationship added | has duplicate 0008677 |
2014-12-29 05:54 | Knight Otu | Note Added: 0031553 | |
2014-12-30 13:22 | Toady One | Status | confirmed => resolved |
2014-12-30 13:22 | Toady One | Fixed in Version | => Next Version |
2014-12-30 13:22 | Toady One | Resolution | open => fixed |
2014-12-30 13:22 | Toady One | Assigned To | Footkerchief => Toady One |
Notes |
|
|
What are the miners doing instead? |
|
|
|
Ah, never mind, I've figured out the issue: if there are any higher priority designations that are unreachable, the lower priority ones will never be gotten to. In this case I had a number of priority 2 mining squares that couldn't be reached, and this prevented the miners from trying to mine out anything 3 through 7.
For the record, the miners just sat at "No Job". |
|
|
|
Is there a save for this situation? I've had 1s behind 2s and it works fine. Is it a certain kind of unreachability? |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, after I freed up the offending tiles the problem went away, but I might have an old backup save that still shows the problem -- I'll look.
The particular unreachable tiles were a vertical row of channel designations, prioritized from 2 through 7 from the middle out, with walls on the top/right/bottom sides and empty space on the left. |
|
|
|
It looks like my last backup save was before I designated the tiles. However, the problem seems to have something to do with a mining designation being on an empty space. Somehow I had a priority 4 mining designation sitting up in thin air, and once I got rid of it, priorities 5 through 7 started working again. |
|
|
|
|
|
(0031507)
|
Ratter
|
2014-12-27 06:09
(edited on: 2014-12-27 06:45) |
|
This just happened to me in 40.23. Miners are standing around with "no job", faced with an inaccessible priority-3 channelling job, when there are priority 4 & 5 digging jobs right in front of them. http://dffd.wimbli.com/file.php?id=10341 [^]
(i checked and it doesn't seem like any of the 3-designations are on empty space; they're just unreachable floor tiles.)
|
|
|
|
Confirmed Ratter's save -- the miner is idle until the priority-3 designations are removed, at which point he springs into action. |
|
|
(0031534)
|
nanite
|
2014-12-28 07:35
|
|
Can confirm this bug affected me. A priority 3 staircase mining job behind a locked door prevented priority 4 digging jobs from proceeding. |
|
|
|
I have a save with a digging layout that ran into this bug after a few seasons. I will have to play with it and see if I can get the bug to repeat. My initial attempts at repeating the bug with a simplified design failed, but when I was initially overcoming the problem I had to reset priorities multiple times to clear all the problem spots. |
|
|
|
frodo5343 posted a save at 0008677. It's not on DFFD, so I don't know how long the download will be good for. |
|