| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2025-04-03 01:21 PDT |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
| 0000937 | Dwarf Fortress | Map Features | public | 2010-04-10 10:58 | 2014-07-07 22:25 | |
| Reporter | SirPenguin | |||||
| Assigned To | Toady One | |||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||
| Product Version | 0.31.02 | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 0.40.01 | ||||
| Summary | 0000937: Aquifer generation does not seem to be respecting mountains/elevations; conglomerate layers related? | |||||
| Description | I'm sure we've all noticed that there seems to be a LOT more aquifers in this version than any others to date. I decided I wanted to figure out why, and I think I've found some problems that could use fixing. -Aquifer elevation makes no sense anymore. You can find them even in the middle of a 100% mountain region, seemingly suggesting impossibly high water tables -The stone "conglomerate" is everywhere and seems to ALWAYS hold an aquifer. In 40d, conglomerate is much rarer and is found near oceans and non-mountain regions. In 31, it's found everywhere, including in the middle of mountain ranges. I believe these two things are related | |||||
| Additional Information | These are with default world gen parameters | |||||
| Tags | aquifer | |||||
| Attached Files | ||||||
 Relationships |
||||||
|
||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0002634) SirPenguin (reporter) 2010-04-10 13:25 |
May very well be related to this post, http://www.bay12games.com/forum/index.php?topic=52276.msg1127667#msg1127667 [^] |
|
(0004318) Kogan Loloklam (reporter) 2010-04-20 01:40 |
No, I've seen it in other generated worlds. Near half a mountain range with a aquifer in the conglomerate layer. First time I ever saw an aquifer in a mountain range. I thought it was a feature though, not a bug. I don't recall seeing any conglomerate without an aquifer in the 2010 versions, come to think of it. |
|
(0024932) SirPenguin (reporter) 2014-07-07 22:22 |
This bug appears to be fixed as of 40.1 |
|
(0024933) Footkerchief (manager) 2014-07-07 22:25 |
Cool. Let us know if not. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2010-04-10 10:58 | SirPenguin | New Issue | |
| 2010-04-10 13:25 | SirPenguin | Note Added: 0002634 | |
| 2010-04-10 20:39 | Khym Chanur | Issue Monitored: Khym Chanur | |
| 2010-04-10 20:40 | Khym Chanur | Tag Attached: aquifer | |
| 2010-04-20 01:40 | Kogan Loloklam | Note Added: 0004318 | |
| 2014-01-27 13:26 | Footkerchief | Relationship added | related to 0004232 |
| 2014-07-07 22:22 | SirPenguin | Note Added: 0024932 | |
| 2014-07-07 22:25 | Footkerchief | Note Added: 0024933 | |
| 2014-07-07 22:25 | Footkerchief | Status | new => resolved |
| 2014-07-07 22:25 | Footkerchief | Fixed in Version | => 0.40.01 |
| 2014-07-07 22:25 | Footkerchief | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2014-07-07 22:25 | Footkerchief | Assigned To | => Toady One |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group |
 |