Mantis Bug Tracker
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap
  

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0005770Dwarf FortressDwarf Mode -- Noblespublic2012-04-03 20:222012-04-04 10:36
Reportermusicmastermsh 
Assigned ToFootkerchief 
PrioritylowSeverityfeatureReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusresolvedResolutionno change required 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version0.34.07 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0005770: Countess sends her own lover to jail for violation of production mandate
DescriptionI smile and think about how dwarfy she is when I see this...

though they've been "lovers" for almost the entire 11 years I've had this fort - maybe she's not really all that into him after all?

Seriously, though - maybe she shouldn't do that? Might interfere with her personal life and all.
Steps To ReproduceGet a dwarf promoted to nobility in a small fort (mine's only 20 dwarves), then ignore their mandates?
Additional Informationstarted this world and fort in 34.05
TagsIntentional/Expected?
Attached Files

- Relationships
related to 0003823new Noble consorts have no room requirements, don't show up in Nobles screen 

-  Notes
(0022069)
Kogut (reporter)
2012-04-03 21:48

 related (from old forum system): "My mayor ordered himself beaten" - http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=6515.msg79136#msg79136 [^]
(0022074)
Footkerchief (manager)
2012-04-04 08:31

 That one was fixed:

000172 ▪ (0.27.169.33e) [dwarf mode][justice] nobles punish themselves for violating export mandates
(0022077)
Quietust (reporter)
2012-04-04 08:46
edited on: 2012-04-04 08:49

 If the countess had punished her husband, then this would probably be a bug (along the lines of 0003823).
(0022079)
NW_Kohaku (reporter)
2012-04-04 09:13

 Maybe this falls more under the "incomplete feature" category than "bug", but making nobles show favoritism is something very reasonable to expect, in the same way that it is humorously bizarre for a mayor to order himself thrown in prison for not fulfilling his own mandate.

Nobody really expects such blind, self-destructive fairness in the system, especially a system that is supposed to be representing the selfishness of those with power to begin with, so it breaks verisimilitude.
(0022081)
Footkerchief (manager)
2012-04-04 10:36

 If the countess had punished her husband, then this would probably be a bug

This is a good point. Entity positions (e.g. consorts) are the intended mechanism for preventing improper punishments, and a lover doesn't get an entity position. I agree that this is just a hair out of bug territory.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2012-04-03 20:22 musicmastermsh New Issue
2012-04-03 21:48 Kogut Note Added: 0022069
2012-04-04 08:30 Footkerchief Tag Attached: Intentional/Expected?
2012-04-04 08:31 Footkerchief Note Added: 0022074
2012-04-04 08:46 Quietust Note Added: 0022077
2012-04-04 08:49 Quietust Note Edited: 0022077 View Revisions
2012-04-04 09:13 NW_Kohaku Note Added: 0022079
2012-04-04 10:36 Footkerchief Note Added: 0022081
2012-04-04 10:36 Footkerchief Status new => resolved
2012-04-04 10:36 Footkerchief Resolution open => no change required
2012-04-04 10:36 Footkerchief Assigned To => Footkerchief
2012-04-04 10:36 Footkerchief Relationship added related to 0003823

Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker