Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-11-22 13:39 PST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |
0005651 | Dwarf Fortress | Dwarf Mode -- Combat | public | 2012-03-15 17:48 | 2012-03-16 07:49 | |
Reporter | Lordraymond | |||||
Assigned To | Footkerchief | |||||
Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always | |
Status | resolved | Resolution | duplicate | |||
Platform | OS | Windows | OS Version | XP | ||
Product Version | 0.34.05 | |||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||
Summary | 0005651: Necromances raise byproducts of butchery, many parts invincible. | |||||
Description | On a recent embark, I had to abandon around year three because of necromancers. I had a butcher's shop which wasn't properly cleaned out, and a stealthed necromancer squad arrived. After raising a few pangolins and tigerfish and milling about, they decided to resurrect a tuft of yak hair. I've read that a [GRASP] tag is required for resurrection, so even that part should be a bug. Shortly thereafter, the hair wreaked havoc. It ended up shattering the spines of about a dozen civilians with single push attacks, and though it failed to do much to my military it was invincible - every attack would give the 'but it passes right through!' message. I'm not completely sure this is a bug, but it seems just silly to have a piece of invincible zombie hair killing everything just by pushing into it. The necromances also raised several, less deadly things such as hooves, which were still mostly invulnerable but did less damage. | |||||
Steps To Reproduce | 1. Embark near necromancer tower 2. Butcher one starting animal or any other that produces something like hair. 3. Wait for necromancers. | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||
Attached Files | ||||||
Relationships | ||||||
|
Notes | |
(0021493) Logical2u (manager) 2012-03-15 19:59 |
Not quite covered by either 0005139 or 0005356, but close. |
(0021506) Footkerchief (manager) 2012-03-16 07:49 |
I think 0005356 completely covers this. |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2012-03-15 17:48 | Lordraymond | New Issue | |
2012-03-15 19:58 | Logical2u | Relationship added | child of 0005139 |
2012-03-15 19:58 | Logical2u | Relationship added | child of 0005356 |
2012-03-15 19:59 | Logical2u | Note Added: 0021493 | |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Note Added: 0021506 | |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Relationship replaced | duplicate of 0005356 |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Status | new => resolved |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Resolution | open => duplicate |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Assigned To | => Footkerchief |
2012-03-16 07:49 | Footkerchief | Relationship deleted | child of 0005139 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2010 MantisBT Group |